1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispref/functions.texi b/doc/lispref/functions.texi
index 216666c713a..37c94c1db74 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/functions.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/functions.texi
@@ -1091,8 +1091,8 @@ yields the form itself:
     @result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))
 @end example
-Note that when evaluting under lexical binding the result is a closure
+Note that when evaluating under lexical binding the result is a
-object (@pxref{Closures}).
+closure object (@pxref{Closures}).
 The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs
 evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using

diff --git a/doc/lispref/functions.texi b/doc/lispref/functions.texi index 216666c713a..37c94c1db74 100644 --- a/doc/lispref/functions.texi +++ b/doc/lispref/functions.texi
@@ -1091,8 +1091,8 @@ yields the form itself:
1091	@result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))	1091	@result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))
1092	@end example	1092	@end example
1093		1093
1094	Note that when evaluting under lexical binding the result is a closure	1094	Note that when evaluating under lexical binding the result is a
1095	object (@pxref{Closures}).	1095	closure object (@pxref{Closures}).
1096		1096
1097	The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs	1097	The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs
1098	evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using	1098	evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using