2 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/doc/emacs/ChangeLog b/doc/emacs/ChangeLog
index 94d3afc7c72..0f3f13ee829 100644
--- a/doc/emacs/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/emacs/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 2012-05-03  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>
 
+        * mule.texi (Output Coding): Reword to improve page-breaks.
+
         * frames.texi (Fonts): Tweak line and page breaks.
         Use example rather than smallexample.  Change cross-reference.
         (Text-Only Mouse): Fix xref.
diff --git a/doc/emacs/mule.texi b/doc/emacs/mule.texi
index cffcb7573ff..b0b35bf14b5 100644
--- a/doc/emacs/mule.texi
+++ b/doc/emacs/mule.texi
@@ -991,12 +991,11 @@ and asks you to choose one of those coding systems.
 behaves a bit differently.  It additionally checks whether the
 @c What determines this?
 most-preferred coding system is recommended for use in MIME messages;
-if not, Emacs tells you that the most-preferred coding system is not
-recommended and prompts you for another coding system.  This is so you
-won't inadvertently send a message encoded in a way that your
-recipient's mail software will have difficulty decoding.  (You can
-still use an unsuitable coding system if you type its name in response
-to the question.)
+if not, it informs you of this fact and prompts you for another coding
+system.  This is so you won't inadvertently send a message encoded in
+a way that your recipient's mail software will have difficulty
+decoding.  (You can still use an unsuitable coding system if you enter
+its name at the prompt.)
 
 @c It seems that select-message-coding-system does this.
 @c Both sendmail.el and smptmail.el call it; i.e. smtpmail.el still