2 files changed, 27 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/etc/ChangeLog b/etc/ChangeLog
index 5e93cf72807..4f5053aa960 100644
--- a/etc/ChangeLog
+++ b/etc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,13 +1,17 @@
+2006-11-10  Juanma Barranquero  <lekktu@gmail.com>
+
+        * DEVEL.HUMOR: Two more entries.
+
 2006-11-10  Carsten Dominik  <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
 
         * orgcard.tex (section{Archiving}): Document C-TAB.
         (section{TODO Items and Checkboxes}): Checkbox keys moved to this
         section, added documentation for the key `C-c #'.
 
-2006-11-05  Slawomir Nowaczyk  <slawek@cs.lth.se> (tiny change)
+2006-11-05  Slawomir Nowaczyk  <slawek@cs.lth.se>  (tiny change)
 
         * emacs.py (eargs): Provide eldoc message for builtin types.
-          Make sure eargs always outputs sentinel, to avoid emacs freeze.
+          Make sure eargs always outputs sentinel, to avoid Emacs freeze.
 
 2006-10-22  Chong Yidong  <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
 
diff --git a/etc/DEVEL.HUMOR b/etc/DEVEL.HUMOR
index 94d86407dd4..9e7e4a9910b 100644
--- a/etc/DEVEL.HUMOR
+++ b/etc/DEVEL.HUMOR
@@ -136,3 +136,24 @@ without attempting any course of action that requires an advance
 course in divination.
    There'd be quite a sensational market for that, you know."
                                     -- Emilio Lopes and David Kastrup
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+  "[T]here may be a good reason since the code explicitly checks for
+this; see keyboard.c:789 [...]"
+  "I think I understand, but I can't find the code in keyboard.c.  Do
+you really mean 'line 789'?  Of which revision?"
+  "Sorry; by 789, I mean 3262 :-P"
+                                   -- Chong Yidong and Stefan Monnier
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+  "[...] In my opinion, your change does not either increase or
+decrease readability.  It's a tossup."
+  "Uh, setting tem to '', an artificial empty string, in order to have
+j incremented once again before breaking out of the finished loop is
+readable?
+   Is this kind of 'readable' synonymous to 'comprehensible with
+serious effort', reminiscent of mathematicians' use of 'trivial' as
+synonymous with 'provable with serious effort'?"
+                                              -- RMS and David Kastrup