Revert `open-line' electric-indent sensitivity

* lisp/simple.el (open-line): Remove electric indent code.
  (electric-indent-just-newline): Don't declare.

* test/automated/simple-test.el (open-line-indent): Adjust test.

This partly reverts Artur Malabarba's change that added electric
indent sensitivity to `open-line' (Oct 24 22:26:27 2015 +0100, git
commit bd4f04f86), and adjusts a new test he added right afterwards
(Sat Oct 24 23:43:06 2015 +0100, git commit 207f235e3) accordingly.
However, the new INTERACTIVE argument to `open-line', which he also
added in the first commit, is not reverted here.

See the thread "Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'." on the
Emacs Devel mailing list, and in particular this message:

  From: Artur Malabarba
  Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
  To: Karl Fogel
  Cc: David Kastrup, Pierpaolo Bernardi, emacs-devel
  Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:03:58 +0000
  Message-ID: \
    <CAAdUY-KN06pvCMy5bt3+Buk3yeKjf6n9iB2FaSTTOPpCqPwyhA@mail.gmail.com>

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg01707.html

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/test/automated/simple-test.el b/test/automated/simple-test.el
index 07b5eaa93e4..7e0dbb786a7 100644
--- a/test/automated/simple-test.el
+++ b/test/automated/simple-test.el
@@ -138,6 +138,21 @@
                      (open-line 1)))
                  '("- - " . "\n(a b c d)"))))
 
+;; For a while, from 24 Oct - 19 Nov 2015, `open-line' in the Emacs
+;; development tree became sensitive to `electric-indent-mode', which
+;; it had not been before.  This sensitivity was reverted for the
+;; Emacs 25 release, so it could be discussed further (see thread
+;; "Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'." on the Emacs Devel
+;; mailing list).  The only test case here that started failing after
+;; the reversion is the third one, the one that currently expects
+;; `("(a b" . "\n   \n   c d)")'.  If `open-line' were again sensitive
+;; to electric indent, then the three spaces between the two newlines
+;; would go away, leaving `("(a b" . "\n\n   c d)")'.
+;;
+;; If electric indent sensitivity were re-enabled, we might also want
+;; to make the test cases below a bit stricter, or add some more test
+;; cases that are specific to `electric-indent-mode', since right now
+;; all but one of the cases pass with or without electric indent.
 (ert-deftest open-line-indent ()
   (should (equal (simple-test--dummy-buffer
                    (electric-indent-local-mode 1)
@@ -152,7 +167,7 @@
                    (let ((current-prefix-arg nil))
                      (call-interactively #'open-line)
                      (call-interactively #'open-line)))
-                 '("(a b" . "\n\n   c d)")))
+                 '("(a b" . "\n   \n   c d)")))
   (should (equal (simple-test--dummy-buffer
                    (electric-indent-local-mode 1)
                    (open-line 5 'interactive))