Revert previous change.

There is certainly nothing wrong with writing code like 'lo <= i
&& i <= hi', even if LO happens to a constant.  There isn't even
anything wrong in general with writing 'a <= b' if A happens to
be a constant.  At any rate stylistic changes shouldn't
be done like this without discussion.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/process.c b/src/process.c
index ab30698b9e8..4449493a2b6 100644
--- a/src/process.c
+++ b/src/process.c
@@ -4303,7 +4303,7 @@ wait_reading_process_output (intmax_t time_limit, int nsecs, int read_kbd,
       time_limit = 0;
       nsecs = -1;
     }
-  else if (time_limit > TYPE_MAXIMUM (time_t))
+  else if (TYPE_MAXIMUM (time_t) < time_limit)
     time_limit = TYPE_MAXIMUM (time_t);
 
   /* Since we may need to wait several times,
@@ -4580,7 +4580,7 @@ wait_reading_process_output (intmax_t time_limit, int nsecs, int read_kbd,
                         continue;
                       FD_CLR (channel, &Available);
                       XPROCESS (proc)->read_output_skip = 0;
-                      if (nsecs > XPROCESS (proc)->read_output_delay)
+                      if (XPROCESS (proc)->read_output_delay < nsecs)
                         nsecs = XPROCESS (proc)->read_output_delay;
                     }
                 }
@@ -4696,7 +4696,7 @@ wait_reading_process_output (intmax_t time_limit, int nsecs, int read_kbd,
           if (timers_run != old_timers_run
               && waiting_for_user_input_p == -1
               && (old_buffer != current_buffer
-                  || !EQ (old_window, selected_window)))
+              || !EQ (old_window, selected_window)))
             record_asynch_buffer_change ();
 
           if (leave)