Revert previous change.

There is certainly nothing wrong with writing code like 'lo <= i
&& i <= hi', even if LO happens to a constant.  There isn't even
anything wrong in general with writing 'a <= b' if A happens to
be a constant.  At any rate stylistic changes shouldn't
be done like this without discussion.

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/ChangeLog b/src/ChangeLog
index fee5842c6b6..6843cfac089 100644
--- a/src/ChangeLog
+++ b/src/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2014-07-26  Paul Eggert  <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
+
+        Revert previous change.
+        There is certainly nothing wrong with writing code like 'lo <= i
+        && i <= hi', even if LO happens to a constant.  There isn't even
+        anything wrong in general with writing 'a <= b' if A happens to
+        be a constant.  At any rate stylistic changes shouldn't
+        be done like this without discussion.
+
 2014-07-26  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
 
         * alloc.c (xnmalloc, xnrealloc, xpalloc, make_save_value)