aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/admin
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGlenn Morris2007-05-13 19:46:26 +0000
committerGlenn Morris2007-05-13 19:46:26 +0000
commitc927bd84fa0db5cafdbad82fd7c61c45e0edf5c4 (patch)
treee567225944e43195807a41c9e659bc7e55a4331a /admin
parentd41f3c4acebf1a8a0d1c8bc36a910e12ab4473d0 (diff)
downloademacs-c927bd84fa0db5cafdbad82fd7c61c45e0edf5c4.tar.gz
emacs-c927bd84fa0db5cafdbad82fd7c61c45e0edf5c4.zip
Sync from trunk (though admin/ is not distributed, so this is not
important).
Diffstat (limited to 'admin')
-rw-r--r--admin/notes/copyright22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/admin/notes/copyright b/admin/notes/copyright
index ce8953993de..6c9a7382c33 100644
--- a/admin/notes/copyright
+++ b/admin/notes/copyright
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ lisp/play/tetris.el
228 the concept. 228 the concept.
229 rms: "My understanding is that game rules as such are not copyrightable." 229 rms: "My understanding is that game rules as such are not copyrightable."
230 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html> 230 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html>
231 rms: Legal advice is that we are ok and need not worry about this.
231 232
232lispref/doclicense.texi 233lispref/doclicense.texi
233man/doclicense.texi 234man/doclicense.texi
@@ -405,6 +406,7 @@ lisp/term/README
405 Accordingly, FSF copyright was added. 406 Accordingly, FSF copyright was added.
406 407
407src/unexhp9k800.c (and dependent src/m/sr2k.h) 408src/unexhp9k800.c (and dependent src/m/sr2k.h)
409 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html
408 - briefly removed due to legal uncertainly Jan-Mar 2007. The 410 - briefly removed due to legal uncertainly Jan-Mar 2007. The
409 relevant assignment is under "hp9k800" in copyright.list. File was 411 relevant assignment is under "hp9k800" in copyright.list. File was
410 written by John V. Morris at HP, and disclaimed by the author and 412 written by John V. Morris at HP, and disclaimed by the author and
@@ -425,6 +427,14 @@ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg00257.html
425http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg01427.html 427http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg01427.html
426 428
427 429
430lisp/progmodes/python.el
431Dave Love alerted us to a potential legal problem:
432http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html
433
434On consultation with a lawyer, we found there was no problem:
435http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-05/msg00466.html
436
437
428** Issues that are "fixed" for the release of Emacs 22, but we may 438** Issues that are "fixed" for the release of Emacs 22, but we may
429 wish to revisit later in more detail 439 wish to revisit later in more detail
430 440
@@ -549,9 +559,6 @@ system)
549 Emacs 22 is released (though if they can be fixed before, that is 559 Emacs 22 is released (though if they can be fixed before, that is
550 obviously good): 560 obviously good):
551 561
552Maybe some relevant comments here?
553<http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.legal/browse_thread/thread/123547ea95437a1f>
554
555 562
556Is it OK to just `cvs remove' a file for legal reasons, or is 563Is it OK to just `cvs remove' a file for legal reasons, or is
557something more drastic needed? A removed file is still available from 564something more drastic needed? A removed file is still available from
@@ -586,16 +593,9 @@ etc/TUTORIAL* (translations)
586Done: TUTORIAL.eo 593Done: TUTORIAL.eo
587 594
588 595
589REMOVED src/unexhp9k800.c
590 - we would like to re-add this file if possible. Please let us know
591 if you can clarify its legal status.
592 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html
593
594
595*** These are copyright issues still to be addressed: 596*** These are copyright issues still to be addressed:
596 597
597python.el potential legal problem 598None known.
598http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html
599 599
600 600
601 601