Backport 2011-03-01T03:59:31Z!lekktu@gmail.com from trunk.

*lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.

3 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index d84f98a1322..e368e660fe2 100644
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 2011-03-11  Juanma Barranquero  <lekktu@gmail.com>
 
+        Backport revno:103463 from trunk.
+        * emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.
+
         Backport revno:103622 from trunk.
         * help-fns.el (describe-variable): Don't complete keywords.
         Suggested by Teodor Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>.
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
index 835d26ed585..2fb7c0434b5 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Not documented
 ;;;;;;  flet progv psetq do-all-symbols do-symbols dotimes dolist
 ;;;;;;  do* do loop return-from return block etypecase typecase ecase
 ;;;;;;  case load-time-value eval-when destructuring-bind function*
-;;;;;;  defmacro* defun* gentemp gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "75e86ac663887b54bf1778f2dd028463")
+;;;;;;  defmacro* defun* gentemp gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "12451ac01f94f10d30cf7a8f92625c42")
 ;;; Generated autoloads from cl-macs.el
 
 (autoload 'gensym "cl-macs" "\
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 (autoload 'lexical-let* "cl-macs" "\
 Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
 The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
-successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
 as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
 Common Lisp.
 
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
index 4061e570cef..3e9d7c27258 100644
--- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
 (defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
   "Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
 The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
-successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
+successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
 as in Common Lisp.  This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
 Common Lisp.
 \n(fn VARLIST BODY)"