Fix some minor inconsistencies in the Package examples

* doc/lispref/package.texi (Simple Packages): Use one of the
approved keywords (bug#19490).

* doc/lispref/tips.texi (Library Headers): Use URL instead of
Homepage to make things consistent with "Simple Packages".

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/doc/lispref/package.texi b/doc/lispref/package.texi
index a2f4f55be7d..eb34b8e0af2 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/package.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/package.texi
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ the various headers, as illustrated by the following example:
 ;; Author: J. R. Hacker <jrh@@example.com>
 ;; Version: 1.3
 ;; Package-Requires: ((flange "1.0"))
-;; Keywords: multimedia, frobnicate
+;; Keywords: multimedia, hypermedia
 ;; URL: http://example.com/jrhacker/superfrobnicate
 
 @dots{}
diff --git a/doc/lispref/tips.texi b/doc/lispref/tips.texi
index 01e9a3a851f..855b284a157 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/tips.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/tips.texi
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ explains these conventions, starting with an example:
 ;; Created: 14 Jul 2010
 @group
 ;; Keywords: languages
-;; Homepage: http://example.com/foo
+;; URL: http://example.com/foo
 
 ;; This file is not part of GNU Emacs.