gnus-util.el (gnus-bound-and-true-p): Another comment to explain why we don't use `bound-and-true-p'.

2 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
index 860ccf45206..12cbd30df68 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-11-02  Teodor Zlatanov  <tzz@lifelogs.com>
+
+        * gnus-util.el (gnus-bound-and-true-p): Another comment to explain why
+        we don't use `bound-and-true-p'.
+
 2011-11-01  Teodor Zlatanov  <tzz@lifelogs.com>
 
         * gnus-util.el (gnus-bound-and-true-p): Remove.
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/gnus-util.el b/lisp/gnus/gnus-util.el
index f811c9664af..14551737837 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/gnus-util.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/gnus-util.el
@@ -1986,7 +1986,8 @@ definitions to shadow the loaded ones for use in file byte-compilation."
               (gnus-macroexpand-all expanded environment)))
         form))))
 
-;; simple check, can be a macro but this way, although slow, it's really clear
+;; Simple check: can be a macro but this way, although slow, it's really clear.
+;; We don't use `bound-and-true-p' because it's not in XEmacs.
 (defun gnus-bound-and-true-p (sym)
   (and (boundp sym) (symbol-value sym)))