(Free Software and Free Manuals): Update URL, and remove duplicate text.

2 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog b/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog
index a98d6cd4c63..e567bde6ae3 100644
--- a/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-12-03  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>
+
+        * emacs-lisp-intro.texi (Free Software and Free Manuals):
+        Update URL, and remove duplicate text.
+
 2009-10-28  Robert J. Chassell  <bob@gnu.org>
 
         * emacs-lisp-intro.texi: Don't change urlcolor or linkcolor in tex
diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
index 6cb7b7921c0..49f64fbeff7 100644
--- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
@@ -22109,16 +22109,11 @@ so that we cannot use it.
 Given that writing good English is a rare skill among programmers, we
 can ill afford to lose manuals this way.
 
-@c (texinfo)uref
-(The Free Software Foundation
-@uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html#DescriptionsOfGNUDocumentation, ,
-sells printed copies} of free @uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html,
-GNU manuals}, too.)
-
 Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom, not
 price.  The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly Associates
-charged a price for printed copies---that in itself is fine.  (The Free
-Software Foundation sells printed copies of free GNU manuals, too.)
+charged a price for printed copies---that in itself is fine.  The Free
+Software Foundation @uref{http://shop.fsf.org, sells printed copies} of
+free @uref{http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html, GNU manuals}, too.
 But GNU manuals are available in source code form, while these manuals
 are available only on paper.  GNU manuals come with permission to copy
 and modify; the Perl manuals do not.  These restrictions are the