aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Kangas2020-12-14 19:21:28 +0100
committerStefan Kangas2020-12-14 19:21:28 +0100
commit2f1441cbe3ccd49037e2464485658f7f20f3d804 (patch)
tree9469d4a9cd7fe617dfd68da4092d3fd21f84200b
parentafee776594fc7df881106fab5188f3dd40a3f8b8 (diff)
downloademacs-2f1441cbe3ccd49037e2464485658f7f20f3d804.tar.gz
emacs-2f1441cbe3ccd49037e2464485658f7f20f3d804.zip
Make XEmacs entry in the FAQ more contemporary
* doc/misc/efaq.texi (Difference between Emacs and XEmacs): Make XEmacs entry in the FAQ more contemporary. Remove part about re-using XEmacs code; this is not likely to be relevant these days and in any case is not a frequently asked question. (Bug#45235)
-rw-r--r--doc/misc/efaq.texi36
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/doc/misc/efaq.texi b/doc/misc/efaq.texi
index 06a17d9c468..83c0a19d391 100644
--- a/doc/misc/efaq.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/efaq.texi
@@ -3390,7 +3390,7 @@ problem (@pxref{Reporting bugs}).
3390* Packages that do not come with Emacs:: 3390* Packages that do not come with Emacs::
3391* Spell-checkers:: 3391* Spell-checkers::
3392* Current GNU distributions:: 3392* Current GNU distributions::
3393* Difference between Emacs and XEmacs:: 3393* What was XEmacs?::
3394* Emacs for minimalists:: 3394* Emacs for minimalists::
3395* Emacs for MS-DOS:: 3395* Emacs for MS-DOS::
3396* Emacs for MS-Windows:: 3396* Emacs for MS-Windows::
@@ -3526,35 +3526,21 @@ A list of sites mirroring @samp{ftp.gnu.org} can be found at
3526 3526
3527@uref{https://www.gnu.org/prep/ftp} 3527@uref{https://www.gnu.org/prep/ftp}
3528 3528
3529@node Difference between Emacs and XEmacs 3529@node What was XEmacs?
3530@section What is the difference between Emacs and XEmacs (formerly Lucid Emacs)? 3530@section What was XEmacs?
3531@cindex XEmacs 3531@cindex XEmacs
3532@cindex Difference Emacs and XEmacs
3533@cindex Lucid Emacs
3534@cindex Epoch
3535 3532
3536XEmacs was a branch version of Emacs that is no longer actively 3533XEmacs was a branch version of Emacs that is no longer actively
3537developed. XEmacs was first called Lucid Emacs, and was initially 3534developed. XEmacs last released a new version on January 30, 2009,
3538derived from a prerelease version of Emacs 19. In this FAQ, we use 3535and it lacks many important features that exist in Emacs. Since its
3539the name ``Emacs'' only for the official version. 3536development has stopped, we do not expect to see any new releases.
3540
3541XEmacs last released a new version on January 30, 2009, and it lacks
3542many important features that exists in Emacs. In the past, it was not
3543uncommon for Emacs packages to include code for compatibility with
3544XEmacs. Nowadays, although some packages still maintain such
3545compatibility code, several of the more popular built-in and third
3546party packages have either stopped supporting XEmacs or were developed
3547exclusively for Emacs.
3548 3537
3549Some XEmacs code has been contributed to Emacs, and we would like to 3538In the past, it was not uncommon for Emacs packages to include code
3550use other parts, but the earlier XEmacs maintainers did not always 3539for compatibility with XEmacs. Nowadays, most built-in and third party
3551keep track of the authors of contributed code, which makes it 3540packages have either stopped supporting XEmacs or were developed
3552impossible for the FSF to get copyright papers signed for that code. 3541exclusively for Emacs.
3553(The FSF requires these papers for all the code included in the Emacs
3554release, aside from generic C support packages that retain their
3555separate identity and are not integrated into the code of Emacs
3556proper.)
3557 3542
3543XEmacs was initially derived from a prerelease version of Emacs 19.
3558If you want to talk about these two versions and distinguish them, 3544If you want to talk about these two versions and distinguish them,
3559please call them ``Emacs'' and ``XEmacs.'' To contrast ``XEmacs'' 3545please call them ``Emacs'' and ``XEmacs.'' To contrast ``XEmacs''
3560with ``GNU Emacs'' would be misleading, since XEmacs too has its 3546with ``GNU Emacs'' would be misleading, since XEmacs too has its